🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to erase African American heritage and legacy from the records is under way. One of the political figure's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a prof at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.